Prospective teachers' statistical thinking in technology enhanced inquiry in the context of an integrated approach

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Statistical Thinking, Pre-Service Teacher Education, Information and Communication Technologies, Integrated Curriculum Approach, Learning Scenarios

Resumen

The research reported in the present article aims to evaluate the teacher education learning scenarios implemented in two curricular units of the basic education course, discussing, in particular, the role of the integrated curriculum approach and of the used technologies, in the development of statistical thinking of prospective teachers. The study used a methodology within the interpretative paradigm. In order to evaluate the learning scenarios, it was used participant observation, documents' collection and a questionnaire with open-ended items whose responses were subjected to content analysis, and the frequencies of the emergent categories were determined. The results support the validation of the implemented scenarios. The students developed the reasoning about data representation and associations. The meaning of mean was a critical aspect that would deserve further research.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Beane, J. A. (2000). O que é um currículo coerente? In J. A. Pacheco (Org.). Políticas de integração curricular. Porto: Porto Editora.

Ben-Zvi, D., & Makar, K. (2016). International perspectives on the teaching and learning of statistics. In D. Ben-Zvi & K. Makar (Eds.), The teaching and learning of statistics: International perspectives (pp. 1-10). New York: Springer.

Brown, D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). From university to elementary classroom: Students' experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 599-621.

Brun, M. & Hinostroza, J. E. (2014). Learning to become a teacher in the 21st century: ICT integration in initial teacher education in Chile. Educational Technology & Society, 1, 222-238.

Burgess, T. A. (2007). Investigating the nature of teacher knowledge needed and used in teaching statistics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University at Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and Abroad. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council and the School Redesign Network at Stanford University.

Dawson, V. (2008). Use of information and communication technology by early career science teachers in Western Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 203-219.

European Comission (2017). Digital competence framework for educators (DigCompEdu). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcompedu

Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.

Ferreira, E., Ponte, C., Silva, M. J., & Azevedo, C. (2015). Mind the gap: Digital practices and school. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 6(3), 16-32.

Garffield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). Retrieved July 12, 2015, from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/garfield.htlm

Garffield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2009). Helping students develop statistical reasoning: Implementing a Statistical Reasoning Learning Environment. Teaching Statistics, 31(3), 72-77.

Garffield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2009). Helping students develop statistical reasoning: Implementing a statistical reasoning learning environment. Teaching Statistics, 31(3), 72-77.

Garfield, J. & Gal, I. (1999). Teaching and assessing statistical reasoning. In L. Stiff (Ed.), Developing mathematical reasoning in Grades K-12 (NCTM 1999 Yearbook) (pp. 207–219). Reston, VA: L. Staff.

Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistics Review, 75(3), 372-396.

Groth, R. E. (2007). Toward a conceptualization of statistical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 427-437.

Grugeon, B., Lagrange, J.-B., Jarvis, D., Alagic, M., Das, M., & Hunscheidt, D. (2010). Teacher education courses in mathematics and technology: Analyzing views and options. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 329- 345). New York: Springer.

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? London: The Falmer Press.

Hernández, F., & Ventura, M. (1998). A organização do currículo por projetos de trabalho: O conhecimento é um caleidoscópio (5ª ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed. (Original work published 1996)

Hill, M. & Hill, A. (2008). Elaboração de projectos sociais: Casos Práticos. Porto: Porto Editora.

ITEC Project (2014). Tool 2.2 - Future Classroom Maturity - Model Reference Guide. Retrieved April 27, 2017, from http://fcl.eun.org/documents/10180/14691/2.2+FCMM+reference+guide.pdf/5fe0addb-3934-436c-aba3-8693bf90a95a?version=1.0

Jacobs, H. (1989). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 1-11). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012a). NMC Horizon Report: 2012 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.nmc.org/pdf/2012-horizon-report-K12.pdf

Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012b). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.nmc.org/pdf/2012-horizon-report-HE.pdf

Kaufman, K (2015). Information communication technology: Challenges & some prospects from preservice education to the classroom. Mid-Atlantic Education Review, 2, 1-11.

Kirschner, P., & Selinger, M. (2003). The state of affairs of teacher education with respect to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 5-18.

Klasnja, P., & Pratt, W. (2012). Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45, 184-198.

Konold, C., & Lehrer, R. (2008). Technology and mathematics education: An essay in honor of Jim Kaput. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 49-71) (2ª ed.). New York: Routledge.

Kysilka, M. (2014). Understanding integrated curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 9(2), 197-209.

Lave, J. (1997). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lopes, P., & Fernandes, E. (2014). Literacia, raciocínio e pensamento estatístico com robots. Quadrante, 23(2), 69-93.

Matos, J. F. (2010). Towards a learning framework in mathematics: Taking participation and transformation as key concepts. In M. Pinto & T. Kawasaki (Eds), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 1, pp. 41-59). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Morin, E. (2001). L’enseignement des connaissances. In Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (Ed.), Novo conhecimento nova aprendizagem (pp. 25-33). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2007). Princípios e normas para a Matemática escolar. Lisboa: APM.

Pacheco, J. (2001). Currículo: Teoria e práxis (2ª ed.). Porto: Porto Editora.

Peskin, S. (2012). Is mobile health revolution made for managed care? Managed Care. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from http://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/1012/1012.mobile.html

Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 863-870.

Ponte, J. P., & Fonseca, H. (2001). Orientações curriculares para o ensino da Estatística: Análise comparativa de três países. Quadrante, 10(1), 93-132.

Roldão, M. (1999). Os professores e a gestão flexível do currículo: Perspectivas e práticas em análise. Porto: Porto Editora.

Sacristán, J. (2000). O currículo: Uma reflexão sobre a prática (3ª ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed. (Original work published 1991)

Schawb, J. (1978). The practical: A language for curriculum. In D. E. Orlosky & O. B. Smith (Eds.), Curriculum development: Issues and insights (pp. 18-27). Chicago: Rand MacNally College Publishing Company.

Shaugnessy, J. M. (2006). Research on students’ understanding of some big concepts in statistics. In NCTM (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance, 68th yearbook (pp. 77-97). Reston: NCTM.

Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. Paris: UNESCO.

Silva, M. J., Gomes, C. A., Pestana, B., Lopes, J. C., Marcelino, M. J., Gouveia, C., & Fonseca, A. (2009). Adding space and senses to mobile world exploration. In A. Druin (Ed.), Mobile technology for children (pp. 147-170). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.

Stenhouse, L. (1981). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., Arcavi, A., & Dreyfus, T. (2008). Computerized environments in mathematics classrooms: A research-design view. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research mathematics education (pp. 784-805) (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Tearle, P., & Golder, G. (2008). The use of ICT in the teaching and learning of physical education in compulsory education: How do we prepare the workforce of the future? European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 55-72.

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144.

von Amann, G. (Org.) (2015). Programa de Saúde Escolar 2015. Lisboa: DGS.

Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-265.

Publicado

2017-12-20

Cómo citar

RODRIGUES, M.; CASEIRO, A.; SILVA, M. J. Prospective teachers’ statistical thinking in technology enhanced inquiry in the context of an integrated approach. Revista Internacional de Pesquisa en Educación Matemática, v. 7, n. 2, p. 45-70, 20 dic. 2017.

Número

Sección

Artículos