A concept-based learning progression for rational numbers
Keywords:
Assessment, Cognition, Rational Number, FractionsAbstract
Rational number understanding is viewed as fundamental and critical to developing future knowledge and skills, and is therefore essential for success in the 21st century world. This report describes a provisional learning progression for rational numbers, specifically as embodied in fractions and decimals, that was designed to be useful towards the development of formative assessment.Downloads
References
Andrade, A. (2011). The Clock Project: Gears as visual-tangible representations for mathematical concepts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 93–110.
Arieli-Attali, M. Cayton-Hodges, G.A. (2014). Expanding the CBAL Mathematics Assessment to Elementary Grades: The Development of a Competency Model and a Rational Number Learning Progression. Research Report No. RR-14-08. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Behr, M. J., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A clinical teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(5), 323–341.
Behr, M., & Post, T. (1992). Teaching rational number and decimal concepts. In T. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (2nd ed., pp. 201–248). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysis-emphasis on the operator construct. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T.A. Romberg, (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 13–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Behr, M., Lesh, R., Post, T., & Silver E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–125). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2004). A developmental scale of mental computation with part-whole numbers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 69–86.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89.
Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2011). Progressions for the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (draft). Retrieved from http://commoncoretools.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/ccss_progression_nf_35_2011_08_12.pdf
Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity, and the rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 291–330). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Confrey, J., & Maloney, M. (2010). The construction, refinement, and early validation of the equipartitioning learning trajectory. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 968–975). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Confrey, J., Maloney, A., Nguyen, K., Mojica, G., & Myers, M. (2009, July). Equipartitioning/splitting as a foundation of rational number reasoning using learning trajectories. Paper presented at the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Educational Testing Service. (2012). Outline of provisional learning progressions. Retrieved from the The CBAL English language arts (ELA) competency model and provisional learning progressions web site: http://elalp.cbalwiki.ets.org/Outline+of+Provisional+Learning+Progressions
Fuson, K. C., Carroll, W. M., & Drueck, J. V. (2000). Achievement results for second and third graders using the standards-based curriculum Everyday Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 277–295.
Graeber, A. O., & Tirosh, D. (1990). Insights fourth and fifth graders bring to multiplication and division with decimals. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(6), 565–88.
Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Formative Assessment for Teachers and Students State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards of the Council of Chief State School Officers.
Kalchman, M., Moss, J., & Case, R. (2001). Psychological models for the development of mathematical understanding: Rational numbers and functions. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kieren, T. E. (1995). Creating spaces for learning fractions. In J. T. Sowder & B. P. Schappelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades (pp. 31–66). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Lamon, S. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lamon, S. J. (2001). Presenting and representing from fractions to rational numbers. In National Council of Mathematics (Ed.), The roles of representations in school mathematics 2001 yearbook (pp. 146–165). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Markovits, Z., & Sowder, J. (1994). Developing number sense: An intervention study in grade 7. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(1), 4–29.
Markovits, Z., & Sowder, J. T. (1991). Students’ understanding of the relationship between fractions and decimals. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(1), 3–11.
Moss, J. (2005). Pipes, tubs, and beakers: New approaches to teaching the rational-number system. In National Research Council (Ed.), How students learn: History, math, and science in the classroom (pp. 309–349). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147.
Nesher, P., & Peled, I. (1986). Shifts in reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 67–79.
Novillis, C. F. (1976). An analysis of the fraction concept into a hierarchy of selected subconcepts and the testing of the hierarchical dependencies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 131–144.
Ohlsson, S. (1988). Mathematical meaning and applicational meaning in the semantics of fractions and related concepts. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Oksuz, C., & Middleton, J. A. (2007). Middle school children’s understanding of algebraic fractions as quotients. International Online Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1–14.
Olive, J., & Steffe, L. P. (2002). The construction of an iterative fractional scheme: The case of Joe. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 413–437.
Post, T. R., Cramer, K., Harel, G., Kieren, T., & Lesh, R. (1998). Research on rational number, ratio and proportionality. In S. Berenson (Ed.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME-NA 98 (Vol. 1, pp. 89–93). Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., & Peled, I. (1989). Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 8–27.
Roche, A. (2005). Longer is larger—Or is it? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 10(3), 11–16.
Roche, A. (2010). Decimats: Helping students to make sense of decimal place value. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 4–12.
Sackur-Grisvard, C., & Leonard, F. (1985). Intermediate cognitive organizations in the process of learning a mathematical concept: The order of positive decimal numbers. Cognition and Instruction, 2(2), 157–174.
Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M, Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691-697.
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.
Simon, M. A. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.
Smith, J. P. I. (2002). The development of students’ knowledge of fractions and ratios. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 3–17). Cedar Falls, IA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sowder, J. T. (1995). Instructing for rational number sense. In J. Sowder & B. P. Schappelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades (pp. 15–29). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Stacey, K., & Steinle, V. (1999). Understanding decimals: The path to expertise. In J. Truran & K. Truran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc., Adelaide (pp. 446–453). Sydney, Australia: MERGA.
Steffe, L. P. (2002). A new hypothesis concerning children’s fractional knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 267–307.
Steffe, L. P. (2004). On the construction of learning trajectories of children: The case of commensurate fractions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 129–162.
Thompson, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), Research companion to the principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 95–114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Vergnaud, G. (1994). Multiplicative conceptual field: What and why. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 41–59). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
