A Viennese Wittgenstein? A response to Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37001/ripem.v12i2.2988Palavras-chave:
Wittgenstein, Mathematics Education, Book ReviewResumo
In response to Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé, Michael Peters writes “A Viennese Wittgenstein? A response to Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé” in order to reveal that his process of reading Wittgenstein or any philosopher, opposing ideas through others, is part of the language game of philosophy and often brings benefits in terms of understanding.
Downloads
Referências
Bouveresse, J. (1995) Wittgenstein Reads Freud. Princeton University Press.
Egan, D., Reynolds, S., Wendland, A. (2013) eds. Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Routledge.
Glock, H-J (2004) Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? Metaphilosophy, 35(4): 419-444.
Hacker, P.M.S. (1996) Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
Peters, M.A. (2019) The ethics of reading Wittgenstein, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51:6, 546-558, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1455394
Peters, M.A. (2020) Pedagogical Investigations: Wittgenstein and education, Educ. Real. 45 (3).
Peters, M.A. & Marshall, J.D. (1999) Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Postmodernism, Pedagogy. Bergin & Garvey.
Peters, M.A. & Stickney, J. (2019) Wittgenstein at Cambridge: Philosophy as a way of life, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51:8, 767-778.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Este trabalho está licensiado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
